Recently saw this on twitter by our Prime Minister:
“@NajibRazak: Chinese vernacular schools are an integral part of the country’s education system. These schools will be as it is.”
While I am in-line with his proposed statement, many people feel that we should do away with vernacular schools for their existence hinders the unity of a multi-races committee of Malaysia. I've been talking about my opinion of vernacular schools in Malaysia since a very long time, but it never occurs to me that other than facebook, I'll ever post it in my blog. I wouldn't have posted my opinion regarding this issue if the "kedudukan istimewa" / special position or rights in the Constitution (Article 153) is not to be seen as a problem to unity while the blame is then shifted to Vernacular Schools. Is this the blame game we are playing?
No, it is not the existence of vernacular schools that hinders unity between races. I am from a vernacular school (& to make my situation even more interesting, I'm from an all-girls school: Penang Chinese Girls' High School) and I cook and hang around with other races, girls & boys alike.
I do not just agree with "having" vernacular schools in Malaysia. I am against the "taking away" of vernacular schools. Those two are different. We already have them, so please don't take them away. Taking something away from someone is different from not giving something that was not originally there to someone. Everyone remains to have their right to choose what kind of education they can have. This is a right recognised by the United Nations.
You want unity? Start from repealing your racially discriminative policies. Start from giving everyone fairer opportunities.
Note: I asked for fairer opportunities, not equal opportunities. Equal treatment on unequals is still unfair, thats why we have measures to help rural and disadvantaged groups. And my support for non-discriminative policies do not affect these measures. Mine, and many Malaysian citizens' wish, would be that the approach to necessary "unequal" treatment suited for the unequals should be fair too. Why should "special treatment/rights" be given not based the honest circumstances of the reality but on the qualities inherited since birth?
When the Malaysia is formed, the agreement came with a condition which is then stated in the constitution: "Special Rights". While the argument of "that's how Malaysia is formed so we have to stick to it" does incorporate the truth about what has happened during the formation of Malaysia, it is only half of the truth. The reason for the incorporation of "special rights" provision in our Constitution was to provide everyone, advantaged & disadvantaged / rural & urban communities alike to a guarantee of equal opportunities in life. Nonetheless, having it written in our constitution fails to contemplate the potentially unfair outcome in the long run.
There remains no room for the existence of permanent "special rights" available to anyone that is conditioned upon an inheritance of certain race / colour / ethnicity. "Special rights" should be temporary to an extent that it has fully served its purpose: that is to put everyone on the same start point for equal opportunities. And when it has served its purpose, it has to go away to help other people who really need the "special" treatment.
When the Malaysia is formed, the agreement came with a condition which is then stated in the constitution: "Special Rights". While the argument of "that's how Malaysia is formed so we have to stick to it" does incorporate the truth about what has happened during the formation of Malaysia, it is only half of the truth. The reason for the incorporation of "special rights" provision in our Constitution was to provide everyone, advantaged & disadvantaged / rural & urban communities alike to a guarantee of equal opportunities in life. Nonetheless, having it written in our constitution fails to contemplate the potentially unfair outcome in the long run.
There remains no room for the existence of permanent "special rights" available to anyone that is conditioned upon an inheritance of certain race / colour / ethnicity. "Special rights" should be temporary to an extent that it has fully served its purpose: that is to put everyone on the same start point for equal opportunities. And when it has served its purpose, it has to go away to help other people who really need the "special" treatment.
So before you take something that is not explicitly discriminative (existence of vernacular schools), that might or might not be the cause of non-unity, ask yourself if you would want to give up your authority & "special rights".
My holding on to vernacular schools is my effort to preserve the school that I came from that has formed part of many people's life which has become some sort of our culture. But what is yours? If you want to take that away from me for unity, why, then, would you allow the existence of "special rights" conditional on race / colour / ethnicity?
Because of your inconsistency in actions and decisions, I do not believe you are taking vernacular schools for unity. To convince everyone of that kind of intention, you need consistency in your words, your actions and your decisions.

Thanks for reading and I end this post with a picture of St Pancras Renaissance Hotel of London. ;)
No connection with the theme of this post or whatsover, just posting it cause I just took this picture not long ago :P
x